Tuesday, December 02, 2008   
  Search   
 
Register  Login  
Forums  
     Minimize  

Welcome to MeraWindows forums.

Thank you for being at the Microsoft Windows Community Site. You may have to register before posting in forums. It's absolutely free. After registering, you can get all the benefits available to our registered members, you can access our Downloads section, you can participate in contests, etc. You can post in forums in English as well as in Hindi, in fact we encourage you to use Hindi in your posts. If you have any problem with registration or login, please contact us.

     
  


 
  Microsoft Windows Forums  General  Hardware Zone  The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: November 2007
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 11/7/2007 8:33 PM
User is offline Salil
204 posts
Senior Member




The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: November 2007 

source for thread : toms hardware

 

Introduction

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great - that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget.

If you don't have the time to research the benchmarks, or if you don't feel confident enough in your ability to make the right decision, fear not. We at Tom's Hardware Guide have come to your aid, with a simple list of the best gaming cards offered for the money.

October Review And November Updates:

October saw the 2900 PRO come in numbers and get sold out almost as quickly. It's certainly a lot harder to find the card now, and it's become apparent that the 2900 PRO was possibly a model created only to get rid of the remaining 2900 XT GPUs before the next generation midrange arrives: the Geforce 8800 GT and the Radeon 3800 series.

The veil has been lifted off the 8800 GT specifications and performance, and WOW, does this card perform. This new midrange champion - supposedly for the $200 to $250 price point - has shown itself to be markedly faster than the GeForce 8800 GTS 640 MB, and on the heels of the former 8800 GTX champ. This card probably should have been called the 8900 GT, because it messes with the standard GeForce GS-GT-GTS-GTX hierarchy / naming scheme by jumping ahead of the GTS. But it does the job, so who cares what it's called? The only questions now are when will we see the 8800 GT on the streets, and how much will the street price be?

The upcoming Radeon 3800 series has a lot to live up to, now that we've seen the 8800 GT performance numbers. It's been announced that the new Radeons will fully support DirectX 10.1, but this is almost a non-issue since there are precious few games that support the current DirectX 10 standard. The upcoming Radeon has to be able to compete against the 8800 GT on the frames-per-second front, or it's in trouble. Hopefully ATI will release the card in the next few weeks, and it will give the 8800 GT a run for its money.

Other than that, we've seen some prices drop across the board. The 8600 GT GDDR3 and 7900 GS have been reintroduced to the list due to price cuts. On the AGP side of things, the 2600 XT is an affordable and worthwhile choice, as is the X1950 GT.

The Best Gaming Graphics Cards For The Money

A few simple guidelines to keep in mind when reading this list include:

  • This list is for gamers who want to get the most for their money. If you don't play games, the cards in this list are more expensive than you need.
  • Prices and availability changes on a daily basis. We can't offer up-to-the-minute accurate pricing info, but we can list some good cards that you probably won't regret buying at the price ranges we suggest.
  • The list is based on some of the best U.S. prices from online retailers. In other countries or retail, your mileage will most certainly vary.
  • These are new card prices. No used or open box cards are in the list; they might be a good deal, but it's outside the scope of what we're trying to do.

 

PCI Express Interface

Best PCIe Card For Under $100
Radeon X1650 GT
Codename: RV560
Process: 80nm
Pixel Shaders: 24
Vertex Shaders: 6
Texture Units: 8
ROPs: 8
Memory Bus: 128-bit
Core Speed MHz: 400
Memory Speed MHz: 400 (800 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 9.0c / SM 3.0

Found as low as $75 online, the X1650 GT is a low-cost gaming darling, with 24 pixel shaders and fast-for-the-price GDDR3 memory. At stock speeds it should be a little faster than the 7800 GS and X1650 PRO, and overclocked it should be on par with the 7600 GT and X1650 XT. This overclockable card is a great base for a budget gaming machine.

The worst thing about this card is that it's priced close to competitors. The 7600 GT can be had for as low as $90 now. Then again, if you're going to spend the extra $15 for a 7600 GT, you should consider spending a further $10 for the 2600 XT. We have to make a recommendation, so the X1650 GT gets the props for its low price and gaming potential.

Best PCIe Card For ~$100: Tie
Radeon HD 2600 XT
Codename: RV630
Process: 65nm
Universal Shaders: 128
Texture Units: 8
ROPs: 4
Memory Bus: 128-bit
Core Speed MHz: 800
Memory Speed MHz: 700 (1400 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10 / SM 4.0

The performance of the 2600 XT is very close to that of the GeForce 8600 GT, but the 2600 XT has a performance edge when antialiasing is disabled. Although the GeForce seems to have the edge when antialiasing is turned on, it's not much of a real-world advantage, since neither card can effectively use 4x AA beyond 1024x768.

GeForce 8600 GT
Codename: G84
Process: 80nm
Universal Shaders: 32
Texture Units: 16
ROPs: 8
Memory Bus: 128-bit
Core Speed MHz: 540
Memory Speed MHz: 700 (1400 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10 / SM 4.0

The 8600 GT was a terrible buy at $150, but now, as it approaches the $100 price point, it's much more attractive. The 8600 GT will slightly beat the old 7600 GT and X1650 XT in raw performance in the $100 price category. In addition to speed, the 8600 GT has the added bonus of being DirectX 10 compatible, as well as being a good overclocker.

NOTE: Beware of slower DDR2 versions of the 8600 GT! The GDDR3 versions are the recommended cards - DDR2 equipped 8600 GTs will be notably slower. The cheapest GDDR3 versions of the card we could find started at $105 online.


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
New Post 11/7/2007 8:35 PM
User is offline Salil
204 posts
Senior Member




Re: The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: November 2007 
Best PCIe Card For ~$125: Tie
Radeon X1950 PRO
Codename: RV570
Process: 90nm
Pixel Shaders: 36
Vertex Shaders: 8
Texture Units: 12
ROPs: 12
Memory Bus: 256-bit
Core Speed MHz: 575
Memory Speed MHz: 690 (1380 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 9.0c / SM 3.0

With no high-performance DirectX 10 cards under $200 to compete against it, the relatively powerful X1950 PRO is having a field day. Yes, the 8600 GTS is a DirectX 10 card, but it's more expensive than the X1950 PRO, and isn't in the same performance league when higher resolutions are used.

The card's other competition is the 7900 GS. The X1950 PRO will usually beat the 7900 GS in most benchmarks at stock speeds, but the 7900 GS has a reputation for overclocking. The only other competition is its X1950 GT brother, which has an identical GPU, but slightly lower clockspeeds. It's difficult to recommend the GT, when it's only about $10 cheaper.

GeForce 7900 GS
Codename: G71
Process: 90nm
Pixel Shaders: 20
Vertex Shaders: 7
Texture Units: 20
ROPs: 16
Memory Bus: 256-bit
Core Speed MHz: 450
Memory Speed MHz: 660 (1320 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 9.0c / SM 3.0

This card is essentially an overclocked 7800 GT, sporting a 256-bit memory bus and decent clock speeds; it's a very good performer and a solid card for the money.

While the X1950 PRO is a slightly stronger performer at stock speeds, the 7900 GS has a good overclocking reputation, while the X1950 PRO does not.

BEST PCIe CARD FOR ~$200-$300
GeForce 8800 GT
Codename: G92
Process: 65nm
Universal Shaders: 112
Texture Units: 56
ROPs: 16
Memory Bus: 256-bit
Core Speed MHz: 600
Memory Speed MHz: 900 (1800 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10 / SM 4.0

This card isn't yet available at the time of writing this article, but it's coming soon, and if you have the $250 to spend on a video card, wait for it. Seriously.

The 8800 GT performs within a stone's throw of the 8800 GTX in the benchmarks we've seen, which is pretty incredible for a card in this price range.

There are only two reasons not to buy an 8800 GT: either you can't find one for sale, or you want to wait and see what the upcoming Radeon 3800 series can do before dropping your cash on a card.

 

Best PCIe Card For $300-$550 : None

Why spend $375 for an 8800 GTS 640MB or Radeon 2900 XT, when the cheaper 8800 GT will soundly beat them both more often than not? And how could you justify spending $500 on an 8800 GTX for the marginal performance gain over the 8800 GT? Indeed, for the price of a single GTX, you might be able to purchase two 8800 GTs in SLI mode which would beat the 8800 GTX.

Best PCIe Card For ~$600
GeForce 8800 Ultra
Codename: G80
Process: 90nm
Universal Shaders: 128
Texture Units: 64
ROPs: 24
Memory Bus: 384-bit
Core Speed MHz: 612
Memory Speed MHz: 1080 (2260 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10 / SM 4.0

With the 8800 GT cannibalizing the recommendations for the rest of the GeForce 8800 and Radeon 2900 series, the lone wolf still stands: the 8800 Ultra. This is still the fastest card that money can buy, so even though the 8800 GTX might have lost a little luster, the Ultra still has the champion's title going for it. If you have unlimited funds, this is the card to get.

AGP Interface

Best AGP Card For Under $100
GeForce 7600 GS
Codename: G73
Process: 90nm
Pixel Shaders: 12
Vertex Shaders: 5
Texture Units: 12
ROPs: 8
Memory Bus: 128-bit
Core Speed MHz: 400
Memory Speed MHz: 400 (800 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 9.0c / SM 3.0

With identical features to its faster 7600 GT brethren, the 7600 GS lacks only the core and memory clock speeds - however, the GT's clock speeds are so high that the GS pales in comparison. Nevertheless, the 7600 GS is a good performer in this AGP segment. The worst thing we can say about it is that it's pretty close to $100, and the 2600 XT doesn't cost much more for a good deal more performance.


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
New Post 11/7/2007 8:35 PM
User is offline Salil
204 posts
Senior Member




Re: The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: November 2007 
Best AGP Card For ~$115
Radeon HD 2600 XT
Codename: RV630
Process: 65nm
Universal Shaders: 128
Texture Units: 8
ROPs: 4
Memory Bus: 128-bit
Core Speed MHz: 800
Memory Speed MHz: 700 (1400 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 10 / SM 4.0

The 2600 XT is relatively new to the AGP scene, but almost as cheap as its PCIe cousin. This is the fastest DirectX 10 card available for AGP at this time, and surprisingly offers a great deal of performance at the $110 price point. In addition, this card has the power to accelerate the entire HD video pipeline - we haven't tested it, but in theory, this card should enable demanding HD-DVD and Blu-Ray disks to be played on older CPUs.

Best AGP Card For ~$130
Radeon X1950 GT
Codename: RV570
Process: 90nm
Pixel Shaders: 36
Vertex Shaders: 8
Texture Units: 12
ROPs: 12
Memory Bus: 256-bit
Core Speed MHz: 500
Memory Speed MHz: 600 (1380 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 9.0c / SM 3.0

The X1950 GT is a slightly underclocked X1950 PRO, but for noticeably less cash. You won't find a better deal for upgrading your AGP rig, and let's face it: you probably don't want to invest all that much money into an older standard that you can't migrate to your next PC.

Best AGP Card For ~$235
Radeon X1950 XT (by Gecube)
Codename: R580
Process: 90nm
Pixel Shaders: 48
Vertex Shaders: 8
Texture Units: 16
ROPs: 16
Memory Bus: 256-bit
Core Speed MHz: 628
Memory Speed MHz: 700 (1400 effective)
DirectX / Shader Model DX 9.0c / SM 3.0

The X1950 XT - manufactured exclusively by Gecube - is simply the most powerful card ever to grace the AGP bus. This card's closest competition is the XFX 7950 GT, which costs slightly more but is a lot less powerful.

At $235, it is a bit of a tough pill to swallow for a dying interface. I would only recommend the X1950 XT AGP to someone with a very fast AGP system who already has a power supply with enough juice to handle the X1950 XT.

It must be noted that if you have $235 to spend on an AGP card - and possibly an extra $100 for a power supply that can handle it - you may be much better off purchasing a PCI Express motherboard, CPU and PCIe graphics card.

PCIe graphics cards are cheaper than their AGP cousins. If you upgrade your system to PCIe and sell your old components, you may actually spend a similar amount of money compared to buying an expensive AGP card alone.


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
New Post 11/7/2007 8:37 PM
User is offline Salil
204 posts
Senior Member




Re: The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: November 2007 

What About This Other Card That's Not On The List?

How Do I Know If It's A Good Deal?

This will happen! In fact, it's guaranteed to happen, because both stock levels and prices change quickly. So how do you know if that card you've got your eye on is a good buy in its price range?

Here are two resources to help you judge if a card is a good buy. The first is the graphics card hierarchy chart, which groups graphics cards with similar overall performance into "tiers." The top tier contains the highest performing cards available, and performance decreases as you go down the tiers from there.

You can use this hierarchy to compare the pricing between two cards, to see which one is a better deal and also to determine if an upgrade is worthwhile. I don't recommend upgrading your graphics card unless the replacement card is at least three tiers higher. Otherwise, the upgrade is somewhat horizontal, and you may not notice a worthwhile difference in performance.

At the request of readers, I have added mobile and integrated chipsets to the hierarchy chart. I want to make it clear that there is very little performance data available for these graphic solutions. While the discrete video chipsets on the chart are placed based on a lot of information, many of the laptop chipset positions on the chart are guesstimates based on their specifications. At worst, I don't think they're more than a tier away from their actual performance, but this is something to keep in mind when considering mobile graphic chipsets.

Geforce Radeon
8800 GT, 8800 GTX, 8800 Ultra  
8800 GTS HD 2900 PRO, HD 2900 XT
7950 GX2 X1950 XTX
  X1950 XT, X1900 XTX
7800 GTX 512, 7900 GTO, 7900 GTX X1900 XT
7800 GTX, 7900 GT, 7950 GT X1800 XT, X1900 AIW, X1900 GT, X1950 PRO
7800 GT, 7900 GS, Go 7950 GTX, 8600 GTS X1800 XL, X1950 GT, Mobility X1800 XT
6800 Ultra, 7600 GT, 7800 GS, Go 7800 GTX, Go 7900 GTX, 8600 GT X800 XT (& PE), X850 XT (& PE), X1650 XT, X1800 GTO, Mobility X1900, HD 2600 XT
6800 GT, 6800 GS (PCIe), Go 7800, Go 7900 GS, 8700M GT X800 XL, X800 GTO2/GTO16, Mobility X800 XT, HD 2600 PRO, Mobility HD 2600 XT
6800 GS (AGP), Go 6800 Ultra, Go 7600 GT, 8600M GT X800 GTO 256mb, X800 PRO, X850 PRO, X1650 GT, Mobility HD 2600
6800, Go 6800, 7300 GT GDDR3, 7600 GS, Go 7700, 8600M GS X800, X800 GTO 128mb, X1600 XT, X1650 PRO, Mobility X1800
6600 GT, 6800LE, 6800 XT, 7300 GT DDR2, Go 7600 (128-bit), 8500 GT 9800 XT, X700 PRO, X800 GT, X800 SE, Mobility X800, X1300 XT, X1600 PRO, HD 2400 XT
FX 5900, FX 5900 Ultra, FX 5950 Ultra, 6600 (128-bit), Go 6800 (128-bit) 9700, 9700 PRO, 9800, 9800 PRO, X700, X1300 PRO, Mobility X1450, X1550, Mobility X1600, Mobility X1700, HD 2400 PRO, Mobility HD 2400 XT, Mobility X2500
FX 5800 Ultra, FX 5900 XT, Go 6600, Go 7600 (64-bit), Go 8600M GS 9500 PRO, 9600 XT, Mobility 9800, 9800 PRO (128-bit), X600 XT, Mobility X700, X1050 (128-bit), Mobility X1350, Mobility X1400, Mobility X2300, Mobility HD 2400
4 Ti 4600, 4 Ti 4800, FX 5700 Ultra, 6200 9600 PRO, Mobility 9700 (128-bit), 9800 LE, X600 PRO, Mobility X600, Mobility X1300, Xpress 1250, Mobility HD 2300
4 Ti4200, 4 Ti4400, 4 Ti4800 SE, FX 5600 Ultra, FX 5700, 6600 (64-bit), 7300 GS, 8400 GS 9500, 9550, 9600, Mobility 9600, X300, X1050 (64-bit)
3 Ti500, FX 5200 Ultra, FX 5600, FX 5700 LE, Go 5700, 6200 TC, 6600 LE, 7300 LE, 8400M GS 8500, 9100, 9000 PRO, 9600 LE, Mobility 9700 (64-bit), X300 SE, X1150
3, 3 Ti200, FX 5200 (128-bit), FX 5500, Go 5600, Go 6200, Go 6400, Go 7200, Go 7300, Go 7400 (64-bit) 9000, 9200, 9250, Mobility 9600 (64-bit), Mobility X300
FX 5200 (64 bit), 6100, 6150, Go 7200, Go 7400 (32-bit) 9200 SE, Xpress 200M, Xpress 1000, Xpress 1150
2 GTS, 4 MX 440, 2 Ultra, 2 Ti, 2 Ti 200 7500
256, 2 MX 200, 4 MX 420, 2 MX 400 SDR, LE, DDR, 7000, 7200
Nvidia TNT ATI Rage 128
 

Summary

There you have it folks: the best cards for the money this month. Now all that's left is to find and purchase them, and we leave that part up to you. The best prices will almost certainly be found online, but sometimes large retail outlets might surprise you with a good sale.

Don't worry too much about which brand you choose, because all of the cards out there stick pretty close to the reference designs by Nvidia and ATI. Just pay attention to price, warranty and the manufacturer's reputation for honoring the warranty if something goes wrong.

Also remember that the stores don't follow this list. Things will change over the course of the month, and you'll probably have to adapt your buying strategy to fluctuating prices.


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
 
New Post 11/7/2007 10:19 PM
User is offline Piyush Gupta
1834 posts
www.piyushworld.com
MW Addict


Re: The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: November 2007 

thats nice

thanks for such detialed informtion

 


Read Forum Guidelines before posting

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  Microsoft Windows Forums  General  Hardware Zone  The Best Gaming Graphics cards for the Money: November 2007


   Get Your Own E-Mail Account @MeraWindows.com Minimize  
New Page 1 New Page 1
Show your cool quotient with @merawindows.com email account